SOLIQ NAZORATIDA SUN’IY INTELLEKT VA KATTA MA’LUMOTLAR (BIG DATA): XALQARO HUQUQIY STANDARTLAR VA TARTIBGA SOLISH MEXANIZMLARI

Authors

  • Tilaganboyev Javohir Ixtiyor o‘g‘li Author

Keywords:

Sun’iy intellekt, Katta ma’lumotlar, Soliq nazorati, Xalqaro huquqiy standartlar, Soliq ma’muriyatchiligi 3.0, Protsessual adolat, Algoritmik tarafkashlik, Yevropa Ittifoqining SI qonuni

Abstract

Ushbu tezis global soliq ma’muriyatchiligida sun’iy intellekt (SI) va katta ma’lumotlar (Big Data) tahlilining jadal integratsiyalashuvini hamda uning huquqiy, axloqiy va tartibga solish oqibatlarini tahlil qiladi. Iqtisodiy hamkorlik va taraqqiyot tashkiloti (OECD) tomonidan ilgari surilgan “Soliq ma’muriyatchiligi 3.0” paradigmasi doirasida davlatlar reaktiv auditdan proaktiv, bashoratli muvofiqlik tizimlariga o'tmoqda. Garchi bu texnologiyalar soliqdan qochish holatlarini aniqlash va davlat daromadlarini oshirishda beqiyos samaradorlikni namoyish etsa-da, ular soliq huquqining qat’iy deterministik tabiati va sun’iy intellektning ehtimoliy (probabilistic) mexanikasi o‘rtasida chuqur ontologik ziddiyatlarni keltirib chiqaradi. Hisobotda “qora quti” (black box) muammosi, algoritmik kamsitish (xususan, Niderlandiyadagi Toeslagenaffaire fojiasi misolida) va soliq to‘lovchilarning protsessual adolatga bo‘lgan huquqlari batafsil ko‘rib chiqiladi. Shuningdek, hujjatda xalqaro miqyosda shakllanayotgan huquqiy bazalar, jumladan Yevropa Ittifoqining Sun’iy intellekt to‘g‘risidagi qonuni (EU AI Act) va uning ma’muriy istisnolari, Umumiy ma’lumotlarni himoya qilish reglamenti (GDPR), Yevropa Kengashi Konvensiyasi hamda BMT va XVF (IMF) tomonidan ishlab chiqilayotgan yangi standartlar qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Xulosa o‘rnida, hisobot texnologik innovatsiyalarni inson huquqlari va shaffoflik bilan muvozanatlash zarurligini ta’kidlab, kelajakdagi soliq tizimlari uchun Tushuntirilishi mumkin bo‘lgan sun’iy intellekt (XAI) kabi amaliy yechimlarni taklif etadi.

References

1. Alarie, B. and AIdid, A. (2023) The legal singularity: How artificial intelligence can make law radically better. University of Toronto Press. https://jackmanlaw.utoronto.ca/research/legal-singularity-how-artificial-intelligence-can-make-law-radically-better.

2. Amnesty International (2021) Xenophobic Machines: Discrimination through algorithmic profiling in the Dutch childcare benefit scandal. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/10/xenophobic-machines-dutch-child-benefit-scandal/.

3. Aslett, J., Hamilton, S., Gonzalez, I., Hadwick, D., Hardy, M.A. and Pérez, A. (2024) ‘Understanding Artificial Intelligence in Tax and Customs Administration’, IMF Technical Notes and Manuals, 2024(006). https://www.imf.org//media/files/publications/tnm/2024/english/tnmea2024006.pdf.

4. Belahouaoui, R. and Alm, J. (2026) ‘Tax fraud detection using artificial intelligence-based technologies: Trends and implications’, International Journal of Scientific Research and Archive. https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/502

5. Blank, L. and Osofsky, L. (2022) ‘Automated Legal Guidance Federal Agencies’, North Carolina Law Review. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/faculty_publications/610/

6. Bradlow, J. (2026) ‘Tax Practitioner Warns of AI Accuracy, Privacy Risks’, Thomson Reuters Checkpoint. https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/news/tax-practitioner-warns-of-SI-accuracy-privacy-risks/.

7. CIAT (2021) Use of Big Data in Tax Administrations. https://www.ciat.org/use-of-big-data-in-tax-administrations/?lang=en.

8. Council of Europe (2024) Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-legal-materials/article/framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence-and-human-rights-democracy-and-the-rule-of-law-council-eur/0CCDA03299BF85537031F1CA26CF2CBD

9. Dutch Data Protection Authority (2022) Belastingdienst – Verwerking van persoonsgegevens in de Fraude Signale Voorziening (FSV). https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/uploads/imported/onderzoek_belastingdienst_fraude_signalering_voorziening_fsv.pdf

10. Edicom (2024) What is SAF-T and how does it work?

https://edicomgroup.com/learning-center/what-is-saft.

11. European Union (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). https://gdpr-info.eu/

12. European Union (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/

13. Hadwick, D. (2024) ‘Slipping Through the Cracks, the Carve-outs for SI Tax Enforcement Systems in the EU SI Act’, European Papers-A Journal on Law and Integration, 3, pp. 936-955. https://www.europeanpapers.eu/system/files/pdf_version/EP_eJ_2024_3_SS1_2_David_Hadwick_00793.pdf

14. Hadwick, D. (2025) Deus Tax Machina: the use of artificial intelligence by EU tax administrations and its impact on taxpayers’ fundamental rights. University of Antwerp. https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/40d728motoMa8

15. Hadwick, D. and Lan, S. (2021) ‘Lessons to Be Learned from the Dutch Childcare Allowance Scandal: A Comparative Review of Algorithmic Governance by Tax Administrations in the Netherlands, France and Germany’, World Tax Journal, 13(1). https://taxpayer-rights.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/David-Hadwick-Toeslagenaffaire.pdf

16. IMF (2024) Greece: Technical Assistance Report—Tax Administration. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2024/english/1grcea2024002.pdf

17. Linna, T. and Linna, E. (2026) ‘Challenges for generative AI in legal reasoning’, Discover Artificial Intelligence, 6(170). https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstreams/28d574c3-c9fe-4775-842f-6313b1ae5c8a/download.

18. Marosavat (2024) SAF-T Requirement in Norway: New Format by 2025 https://marosavat.com/vat-news/saf-t-in-norway.

19. Mittra, S., Siwale, T., Fras, L. and Jensen, A. (2026) Harnessing AI and data for tax administration. International Growth Centre. https://www.theigc.org/sites/default/files/2026-01/Harnessing-AI-and-Data-for-Tax-Administration_0.pdf

20. Mohun, J. and Roberts, A. (2020) Cracking the Code: Rulemaking for humans and machines, OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2020/10/dechiffrer-le-code_d56cab77.html.

21. OECD (2020) Tax Administration 3.0: The Digital Transformation of Tax Administration. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/tax-administration-3-0-the-digital-transformation-of-tax-administration_ca274cc5-en.html.

22. OECD (2024) Governing with Artificial Intelligence: AI in tax administration. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_795de142-en/full-report/SI-in-tax-administration_30724e43.html.

23. OECD (2025) Tax Administration 2025: Comparative Information on OECD and other Advanced and Emerging Economies. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/tax-administration-2025_cc015ce8-en.html.

24. Pasqua, M. (2025) Bridging Soft and Hard Law in AI Governance, BIICL. https://www.biicl.org/blog/121/bridging-soft-and-hard-law-in-SI-governance.

25. Rizzo, S. and Hassan, M. (2026) ‘Proportionate Risk Management for Tax-Related AI Systems: Analysis and Implications under EU and US Law’, World Tax Journal, 18. https://shop.ibfd.org/journal/proportionate-risk-management-tax-related-ai-systems-analysis-and-implications-under-eu-and

26. Stenbøg, S. (2026) ‘Artificial Intelligence in tax administration: From early innovation to modern transformation’, OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration. https://www.oecd.org/en/blogs/2026/04/artificial-intelligence-in-tax-administration-from-early-innovation-to-modern-transformation.html.

27. Suryadi, I. (2026) ‘The Impact of AI on Taxpayer Compliance’, Sharia Journal, 1(2). https://shariajournal.com/index.php/IJIJEL/article/view/1621

28. Tax Management International (2025) ‘Don’t Trust AI, Always Verify: Tax Law Still Needs Humans’, Bloomberg Tax. https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-management-international/dont-trust-SI-always-verify-tax-law-still-needs-humans-pt-1-1.

29. TPA Global (2025) How AI Is Reshaping Greece’s Tax Administration. https://tpa-global.com/2025/10/01/SI-is-reshaping-greeces-tax-administration/.

30. Tripathi, C.K. (2025) ‘Algorithmic Accountability and Ethical AI Frameworks for Regulatory Governance in Financial Technologies’, International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 16(3), pp. 796-799. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396230398_Algorithmic_Accountability_and_Ethical_SI_Frameworks_for_Regulatory_Governance_in_Financial_Technologies

31. UN Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters (2026) Tax Administration and Artificial Intelligence: Proposed work plan. https://financing.desa.un.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/32nd%20UNTC%20Session%20CRP.5%20Tax%20Adm%20and%20SI.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11